FMX vs ZVIA

Fomento Economico Mexicano S.A. vs Zevia PBC — Valuation Comparison 2026

FMX

Bottled & Canned Soft Drinks & Carbonated Waters
Fomento Economico Mexicano S.A.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$119.03
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

ZVIA

Bottled & Canned Soft Drinks & Carbonated Waters
Zevia PBC
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$1.55
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FMX Fair ValueFMX Upside ZVIA Fair ValueZVIA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $25.42 -78.6% $0.71 -54.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $60.46 -49.2% $2.71 +108.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FMX vs ZVIA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FMX vs ZVIA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FMX scores higher with a 6.9/10 quality rating vs ZVIA's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Fomento Economico Mexicano S.A. (FMX) and Zevia PBC (ZVIA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FMX currently trades at $119.03 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while ZVIA trades at $1.55 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).