FLUX vs FPS

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. vs Forgent Power Solutions, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FLUX

Electrical Equipment & Parts
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
Quality
5.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.12
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

FPS

Electrical Equipment & Parts
Forgent Power Solutions, Inc.
Quality
1.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$47.56
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FLUX Fair ValueFLUX Upside FPS Fair ValueFPS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.02 -98.6% $15.86 -66.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.12 +61.5% $10.64 -69.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FLUX vs FPS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FLUX vs FPS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FLUX scores higher with a 5.8/10 quality rating vs FPS's 1.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX) and Forgent Power Solutions, Inc. (FPS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FLUX currently trades at $1.12 with a QOC of 5.8/10, while FPS trades at $47.56 with a QOC of 1.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).