FIGR vs FLD

Figure Technology Solutions, In vs Fold Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FIGR

Capital Markets
Figure Technology Solutions, In
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$34.73
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

FLD

Capital Markets
Fold Holdings, Inc.
Quality
4.1
out of 10
Value Trap
22
SAFE
Price
$1.00
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FIGR Fair ValueFIGR Upside FLD Fair ValueFLD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.59 -81.0% $0.31 -69.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.93 -77.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $3.48 -90.0% $0.02 -98.0%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FIGR vs FLD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FIGR vs FLD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FIGR scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs FLD's 4.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Figure Technology Solutions, In (FIGR) and Fold Holdings, Inc. (FLD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FIGR currently trades at $34.73 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while FLD trades at $1.00 with a QOC of 4.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).