FIGR vs FINV

Figure Technology Solutions, In vs FinVolution Group — Valuation Comparison 2026

FIGR

Loan Brokers
Figure Technology Solutions, In
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$35.35
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

FINV

Loan Brokers
FinVolution Group
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
15
SAFE
Price
$5.25
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FIGR Fair ValueFIGR Upside FINV Fair ValueFINV Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.59 -81.4% $8.30 +58.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.93 -77.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $9.57 -72.9% $26.82 +410.9%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FIGR vs FINV — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FIGR vs FINV — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FINV scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs FIGR's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Figure Technology Solutions, In (FIGR) and FinVolution Group (FINV) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FIGR currently trades at $35.35 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while FINV trades at $5.25 with a QOC of 9.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).