FHI vs HLNE

Federated Hermes, Inc. vs Hamilton Lane Incorporated — Valuation Comparison 2026

FHI

Investment Advice
Federated Hermes, Inc.
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$56.06
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

HLNE

Investment Advice
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$87.13
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FHI Fair ValueFHI Upside HLNE Fair ValueHLNE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $41.74 -25.6% $95.22 +9.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $42.62 -24.0% $52.30 -40.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FHI vs HLNE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FHI vs HLNE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HLNE scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs FHI's 9.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) and Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FHI currently trades at $56.06 with a QOC of 9.2/10, while HLNE trades at $87.13 with a QOC of 9.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).