FERG vs MSM

Ferguson Enterprises Inc. vs MSC Industrial Direct Company, — Valuation Comparison 2026

FERG

Industrial Distribution
Ferguson Enterprises Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$226.49
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

MSM

Industrial Distribution
MSC Industrial Direct Company,
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$109.78
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FERG Fair ValueFERG Upside MSM Fair ValueMSM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $174.74 -22.8% $40.25 -63.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $95.16 -58.0% $34.97 -68.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FERG vs MSM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FERG vs MSM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FERG scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs MSM's 8.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ferguson Enterprises Inc. (FERG) and MSC Industrial Direct Company, (MSM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FERG currently trades at $226.49 with a QOC of 9.0/10, while MSM trades at $109.78 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).