FER vs IESC

Ferrovial N.V. vs IES Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FER

Engineering & Construction
Ferrovial N.V.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$68.30
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

IESC

Engineering & Construction
IES Holdings, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$698.96
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FER Fair ValueFER Upside IESC Fair ValueIESC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $72.16 +5.7% $131.85 -81.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $26.97 -60.5% $159.76 -77.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FER vs IESC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FER vs IESC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IESC scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs FER's 8.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ferrovial N.V. (FER) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FER currently trades at $68.30 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while IESC trades at $698.96 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).