FDS vs ICE

FactSet Research Systems Inc. vs Intercontinental Exchange Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FDS

Financial Data & Stock Exchanges
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$238.90
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

ICE

Financial Data & Stock Exchanges
Intercontinental Exchange Inc.
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$148.30
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FDS Fair ValueFDS Upside ICE Fair ValueICE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $268.85 +12.5% $117.59 -20.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $126.76 -46.9% $43.21 -70.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FDS vs ICE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FDS vs ICE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FDS scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs ICE's 9.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and Intercontinental Exchange Inc. (ICE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FDS currently trades at $238.90 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while ICE trades at $148.30 with a QOC of 9.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).