FDMT vs GILD

4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. vs Gilead Sciences, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FDMT

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$9.91
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

GILD

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$134.43
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FDMT Fair ValueFDMT Upside GILD Fair ValueGILD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.84 -71.4% $76.95 -42.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $65.99 -50.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $8.24 -16.8% $8.32 -93.8%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FDMT vs GILD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FDMT vs GILD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GILD scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs FDMT's 7.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. (FDMT) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FDMT currently trades at $9.91 with a QOC of 7.1/10, while GILD trades at $134.43 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).