FCHL vs GHC

Fitness Champs Holdings Limited vs Graham Holdings Company — Valuation Comparison 2026

FCHL

Education & Training Services
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.40
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

GHC

Education & Training Services
Graham Holdings Company
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$1123.52
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FCHL Fair ValueFCHL Upside GHC Fair ValueGHC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.23 +345.2% $752.26 -33.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.31 -81.8% $191.90 -82.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FCHL vs GHC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FCHL vs GHC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GHC scores higher with a 8.0/10 quality rating vs FCHL's 6.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (FCHL) and Graham Holdings Company (GHC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FCHL currently trades at $1.40 with a QOC of 6.6/10, while GHC trades at $1123.52 with a QOC of 8.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).