FBGL vs IBP

FBS Global Limited vs Installed Building Products, In — Valuation Comparison 2026

FBGL

General Bldg Contractors - Residential Bldgs
FBS Global Limited
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$0.58
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

IBP

General Bldg Contractors - Residential Bldgs
Installed Building Products, In
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$209.98
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FBGL Fair ValueFBGL Upside IBP Fair ValueIBP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.25 -57.0% $163.79 -22.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.49 -14.6% $49.36 -76.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FBGL vs IBP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FBGL vs IBP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IBP scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs FBGL's 6.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing FBS Global Limited (FBGL) and Installed Building Products, In (IBP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FBGL currently trades at $0.58 with a QOC of 6.2/10, while IBP trades at $209.98 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).