FACT vs LOAR

FACT II Acquisition Corp. vs Loar Holdings Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FACT

Aircraft Parts & Auxiliary Equipment, NEC
FACT II Acquisition Corp.
Quality
4.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$10.67
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

LOAR

Aircraft Parts & Auxiliary Equipment, NEC
Loar Holdings Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$64.48
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FACT Fair ValueFACT Upside LOAR Fair ValueLOAR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.95 -91.0% $8.20 -87.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.24 -88.3% $0.72 -98.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FACT vs LOAR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FACT vs LOAR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LOAR scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs FACT's 4.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing FACT II Acquisition Corp. (FACT) and Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FACT currently trades at $10.67 with a QOC of 4.4/10, while LOAR trades at $64.48 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).