EXPD vs FWRD

Expeditors International of Was vs Forward Air Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

EXPD

Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo
Expeditors International of Was
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$157.99
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

FWRD

Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo
Forward Air Corporation
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$10.58
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EXPD Fair ValueEXPD Upside FWRD Fair ValueFWRD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $133.94 -15.2% $3.76 -82.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $60.06 -62.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $176.34 +11.6% $38.63 +265.1%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EXPD vs FWRD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EXPD vs FWRD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EXPD scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs FWRD's 7.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Expeditors International of Was (EXPD) and Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EXPD currently trades at $157.99 with a QOC of 9.2/10, while FWRD trades at $10.58 with a QOC of 7.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).