EW vs ISRG

Edwards Lifesciences Corporatio vs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EW

Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies
Edwards Lifesciences Corporatio
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$86.47
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

ISRG

Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$424.64
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EW Fair ValueEW Upside ISRG Fair ValueISRG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $25.18 -70.9% $82.56 -80.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $25.40 -70.6% $96.05 -77.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EW vs ISRG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EW vs ISRG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ISRG scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs EW's 9.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Edwards Lifesciences Corporatio (EW) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EW currently trades at $86.47 with a QOC of 9.2/10, while ISRG trades at $424.64 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).