ESTA vs FEED

Establishment Labs Holdings Inc vs ENvue Medical, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ESTA

Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies
Establishment Labs Holdings Inc
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$70.69
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

FEED

Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies
ENvue Medical, Inc.
Quality
5.1
out of 10
Value Trap
40
WARN
Price
$0.90
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ESTA Fair ValueESTA Upside FEED Fair ValueFEED Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.70 -73.5% $0.56 -37.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.16 -96.9% $3.97 +233.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ESTA vs FEED — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ESTA vs FEED — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ESTA scores higher with a 6.9/10 quality rating vs FEED's 5.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Establishment Labs Holdings Inc (ESTA) and ENvue Medical, Inc. (FEED) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ESTA currently trades at $70.69 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while FEED trades at $0.90 with a QOC of 5.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).