ESLT vs FACT

Elbit Systems Ltd. vs FACT II Acquisition Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ESLT

Aircraft Parts & Auxiliary Equipment, NEC
Elbit Systems Ltd.
Quality
2.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$880.89
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

FACT

Aircraft Parts & Auxiliary Equipment, NEC
FACT II Acquisition Corp.
Quality
4.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$10.67
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ESLT Fair ValueESLT Upside FACT Fair ValueFACT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $332.09 -62.3% $0.95 -91.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $47.96 -94.2% $1.24 -88.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ESLT vs FACT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ESLT vs FACT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FACT scores higher with a 4.4/10 quality rating vs ESLT's 2.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT) and FACT II Acquisition Corp. (FACT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ESLT currently trades at $880.89 with a QOC of 2.2/10, while FACT trades at $10.67 with a QOC of 4.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).