ESBA vs ESRT

Empire State Realty OP, L.P. Se vs Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ESBA

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Empire State Realty OP, L.P. Se
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$5.50
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

ESRT

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$5.73
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ESBA Fair ValueESBA Upside ESRT Fair ValueESRT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.19 -96.6% $0.10 -98.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.08 -62.2% $2.10 -62.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ESBA vs ESRT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ESBA vs ESRT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ESRT scores higher with a 6.4/10 quality rating vs ESBA's 6.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Empire State Realty OP, L.P. Se (ESBA) and Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (ESRT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ESBA currently trades at $5.50 with a QOC of 6.0/10, while ESRT trades at $5.73 with a QOC of 6.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).