ES vs ETR

Eversource Energy (D/B/A) vs Entergy Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

ES

Electric Services
Eversource Energy (D/B/A)
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$68.27
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

ETR

Electric Services
Entergy Corporation
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$109.05
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ES Fair ValueES Upside ETR Fair ValueETR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $177.52 +62.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.39 -93.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $34.52 -49.4% $19.06 -82.5%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ES vs ETR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ES vs ETR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ES scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs ETR's 8.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Eversource Energy (D/B/A) (ES) and Entergy Corporation (ETR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ES currently trades at $68.27 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while ETR trades at $109.05 with a QOC of 8.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).