EPRT vs EQIX

Essential Properties Realty Tru vs Equinix, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EPRT

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Essential Properties Realty Tru
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$30.58
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

EQIX

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Equinix, Inc.
Quality
9.4
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$1068.04
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EPRT Fair ValueEPRT Upside EQIX Fair ValueEQIX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.81 -38.5% $102.05 -90.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.08 -93.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $13.55 -55.7% $82.28 -92.3%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EPRT vs EQIX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EPRT vs EQIX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EQIX scores higher with a 9.4/10 quality rating vs EPRT's 9.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Essential Properties Realty Tru (EPRT) and Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EPRT currently trades at $30.58 with a QOC of 9.3/10, while EQIX trades at $1068.04 with a QOC of 9.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).