EPM vs EXE

Evolution Petroleum Corporation vs Expand Energy Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

EPM

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Evolution Petroleum Corporation
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$4.24
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

EXE

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Expand Energy Corporation
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$92.98
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EPM Fair ValueEPM Upside EXE Fair ValueEXE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $10.97 +158.7% $77.29 -16.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.39 -91.7% $124.11 +33.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EPM vs EXE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EPM vs EXE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EXE scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs EPM's 6.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) and Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EPM currently trades at $4.24 with a QOC of 6.8/10, while EXE trades at $92.98 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).