EPAC vs SHMD

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. vs SCHMID Group N.V. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EPAC

Misc Industrial & Commercial Machinery & Equipment
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$33.49
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SHMD

Misc Industrial & Commercial Machinery & Equipment
SCHMID Group N.V.
Quality
4.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$6.67
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EPAC Fair ValueEPAC Upside SHMD Fair ValueSHMD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $10.58 -68.4% $1.15 -82.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.61 -65.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $19.71 -41.1% $0.80 -88.6%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EPAC vs SHMD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EPAC vs SHMD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EPAC scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs SHMD's 4.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) and SCHMID Group N.V. (SHMD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EPAC currently trades at $33.49 with a QOC of 9.6/10, while SHMD trades at $6.67 with a QOC of 4.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).