ENR vs ESP

Energizer Holdings, Inc. vs Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ENR

Electrical Equipment & Parts
Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$18.55
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

ESP

Electrical Equipment & Parts
Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$59.64
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ENR Fair ValueENR Upside ESP Fair ValueESP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $63.66 +6.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $31.40 -47.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $3.00 -83.8% $22.32 -62.6%
First Chicago Scenario $4.41 -76.2% $41.84 -29.8%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ENR vs ESP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ENR vs ESP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ESP scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs ENR's 8.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) and Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ENR currently trades at $18.55 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while ESP trades at $59.64 with a QOC of 8.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).