EMR vs GE

Emerson Electric Company vs GE Aerospace — Valuation Comparison 2026

EMR

Electronic & Other Electrical Equipment (No Computer Equip)
Emerson Electric Company
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
31
LOW
Price
$143.82
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

GE

Electronic & Other Electrical Equipment (No Computer Equip)
GE Aerospace
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$323.76
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EMR Fair ValueEMR Upside GE Fair ValueGE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $45.89 -68.1% $85.30 -73.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $27.02 -81.2% $61.81 -80.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EMR vs GE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EMR vs GE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GE scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs EMR's 8.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Emerson Electric Company (EMR) and GE Aerospace (GE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EMR currently trades at $143.82 with a QOC of 8.4/10, while GE trades at $323.76 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).