EL vs EMPG

Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (T vs Empro Group Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EL

Perfumes, Cosmetics & Other Toilet Preparations
Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (T
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$88.95
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

EMPG

Perfumes, Cosmetics & Other Toilet Preparations
Empro Group Inc.
Quality
2.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$17.36
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EL Fair ValueEL Upside EMPG Fair ValueEMPG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $39.86 -55.2% $4.60 -73.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.28 -88.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $51.48 -42.1% $2.96 -82.9%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EL vs EMPG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EL vs EMPG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EL scores higher with a 7.2/10 quality rating vs EMPG's 2.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (T (EL) and Empro Group Inc. (EMPG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EL currently trades at $88.95 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while EMPG trades at $17.36 with a QOC of 2.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).