EIG vs HCI

Employers Holdings Inc vs HCI Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EIG

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Employers Holdings Inc
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$43.50
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

HCI

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
HCI Group, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$154.07
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EIG Fair ValueEIG Upside HCI Fair ValueHCI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $29.86 -31.3% $381.66 +147.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $34.55 -20.6% $300.50 +95.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EIG vs HCI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EIG vs HCI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HCI scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs EIG's 7.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Employers Holdings Inc (EIG) and HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EIG currently trades at $43.50 with a QOC of 7.8/10, while HCI trades at $154.07 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).