EFSCP vs ESQ

Enterprise Financial Services C vs Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

EFSCP

Banks - Regional
Enterprise Financial Services C
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$20.61
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

ESQ

Banks - Regional
Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$109.53
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EFSCP Fair ValueEFSCP Upside ESQ Fair ValueESQ Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $39.27 +90.6% $59.41 -45.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $60.65 +194.4% $71.14 -35.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EFSCP vs ESQ — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EFSCP vs ESQ — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ESQ scores higher with a 9.5/10 quality rating vs EFSCP's 8.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Enterprise Financial Services C (EFSCP) and Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc (ESQ) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EFSCP currently trades at $20.61 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while ESQ trades at $109.53 with a QOC of 9.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).