EDU vs FCHL

New Oriental Education & Techno vs Fitness Champs Holdings Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

EDU

Education & Training Services
New Oriental Education & Techno
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$46.26
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

FCHL

Education & Training Services
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.40
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EDU Fair ValueEDU Upside FCHL Fair ValueFCHL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $46.32 +0.1% $6.23 +345.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $24.86 -46.3% $0.31 -81.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EDU vs FCHL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EDU vs FCHL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EDU scores higher with a 9.1/10 quality rating vs FCHL's 6.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing New Oriental Education & Techno (EDU) and Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (FCHL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EDU currently trades at $46.26 with a QOC of 9.1/10, while FCHL trades at $1.40 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).