DX vs EGP

Dynex Capital, Inc. vs EastGroup Properties, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

DX

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Dynex Capital, Inc.
Quality
7.4
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$13.09
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

EGP

Real Estate Investment Trusts
EastGroup Properties, Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$201.91
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DX Fair ValueDX Upside EGP Fair ValueEGP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $9.50 -27.4% $93.93 -53.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.06 -53.7% $50.31 -75.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DX vs EGP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DX vs EGP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EGP scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs DX's 7.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Dynex Capital, Inc. (DX) and EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DX currently trades at $13.09 with a QOC of 7.4/10, while EGP trades at $201.91 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).