DOC vs DX

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. vs Dynex Capital, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

DOC

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Healthpeak Properties, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
10
SAFE
Price
$19.15
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

DX

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Dynex Capital, Inc.
Quality
7.4
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$13.09
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DOC Fair ValueDOC Upside DX Fair ValueDX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $9.50 -27.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.06 -53.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $3.83 -80.0% $10.00 -23.6%
First Chicago Scenario $24.45 +27.7% $8.32 -36.4%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DOC vs DX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DOC vs DX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DOC scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs DX's 7.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (DOC) and Dynex Capital, Inc. (DX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DOC currently trades at $19.15 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while DX trades at $13.09 with a QOC of 7.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).