DERM vs ELAN

Journey Medical Corporation vs Elanco Animal Health Incorporat — Valuation Comparison 2026

DERM

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Journey Medical Corporation
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$6.20
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

ELAN

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Elanco Animal Health Incorporat
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
33
LOW
Price
$23.98
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DERM Fair ValueDERM Upside ELAN Fair ValueELAN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.27 -79.4% $0.37 -98.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.89 -63.5% $2.89 -87.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DERM vs ELAN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DERM vs ELAN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ELAN scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs DERM's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) and Elanco Animal Health Incorporat (ELAN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DERM currently trades at $6.20 with a QOC of 5.7/10, while ELAN trades at $23.98 with a QOC of 7.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).