CYD vs PSIX

China Yuchai International Limi vs Power Solutions International, — Valuation Comparison 2026

CYD

Engines & Turbines
China Yuchai International Limi
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$56.72
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

PSIX

Engines & Turbines
Power Solutions International,
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$41.68
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CYD Fair ValueCYD Upside PSIX Fair ValuePSIX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $21.72 -61.7% $8.55 -79.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $40.61 -28.4% $22.61 -45.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CYD vs PSIX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CYD vs PSIX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PSIX scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs CYD's 7.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing China Yuchai International Limi (CYD) and Power Solutions International, (PSIX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CYD currently trades at $56.72 with a QOC of 7.3/10, while PSIX trades at $41.68 with a QOC of 9.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).