CXW vs DEA

CoreCivic, Inc. vs Easterly Government Properties, — Valuation Comparison 2026

CXW

Real Estate Investment Trusts
CoreCivic, Inc.
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$21.08
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

DEA

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Easterly Government Properties,
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$23.98
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CXW Fair ValueCXW Upside DEA Fair ValueDEA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.00 -72.1% $39.45 +64.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $9.81 -53.4% $8.26 -65.5%
First Chicago Scenario $16.91 -19.8% $20.32 -15.2%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CXW vs DEA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CXW vs DEA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DEA scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs CXW's 6.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Easterly Government Properties, (DEA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CXW currently trades at $21.08 with a QOC of 6.5/10, while DEA trades at $23.98 with a QOC of 7.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).