CVR vs SPXC

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. vs SPX Technologies, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CVR

Metalworkg Machinery & Equipment
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$9.63
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SPXC

Metalworkg Machinery & Equipment
SPX Technologies, Inc.
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$216.66
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CVR Fair ValueCVR Upside SPXC Fair ValueSPXC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.10 -78.2% $45.03 -79.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.30 -97.4% $71.60 -67.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CVR vs SPXC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CVR vs SPXC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SPXC scores higher with a 9.5/10 quality rating vs CVR's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) and SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CVR currently trades at $9.63 with a QOC of 6.3/10, while SPXC trades at $216.66 with a QOC of 9.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).