CTVA vs EDBL

Corteva, Inc. vs Edible Garden AG Incorporated — Valuation Comparison 2026

CTVA

Agricultural Production-Crops
Corteva, Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$78.28
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

EDBL

Agricultural Production-Crops
Edible Garden AG Incorporated
Quality
3.7
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$0.26
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CTVA Fair ValueCTVA Upside EDBL Fair ValueEDBL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $33.40 -57.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $36.86 -52.9% $1.74 +256.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $72.74 -7.1% $0.22 -54.9%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CTVA vs EDBL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CTVA vs EDBL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CTVA scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs EDBL's 3.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) and Edible Garden AG Incorporated (EDBL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CTVA currently trades at $78.28 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while EDBL trades at $0.26 with a QOC of 3.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).