CSTE vs FBIN

Caesarstone Ltd. vs Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

CSTE

Building Products & Equipment
Caesarstone Ltd.
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.82
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

FBIN

Building Products & Equipment
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
19
SAFE
Price
$39.39
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CSTE Fair ValueCSTE Upside FBIN Fair ValueFBIN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.36 -80.2% $13.54 -65.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.52 -91.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $3.22 +76.7% $35.53 -9.8%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CSTE vs FBIN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CSTE vs FBIN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FBIN scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs CSTE's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Caesarstone Ltd. (CSTE) and Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc (FBIN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CSTE currently trades at $1.82 with a QOC of 2.5/10, while FBIN trades at $39.39 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).