CSL vs GFF

Carlisle Companies Incorporated vs Griffon Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

CSL

Building Products & Equipment
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Quality
9.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$342.69
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

GFF

Building Products & Equipment
Griffon Corporation
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$88.06
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CSL Fair ValueCSL Upside GFF Fair ValueGFF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $221.18 -35.5% $12.80 -85.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $20.82 -93.9% $8.66 -90.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CSL vs GFF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CSL vs GFF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CSL scores higher with a 9.8/10 quality rating vs GFF's 8.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and Griffon Corporation (GFF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CSL currently trades at $342.69 with a QOC of 9.8/10, while GFF trades at $88.06 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).