CRTO vs EDHL

Criteo S.A. vs Everbright Digital Holding Limi — Valuation Comparison 2026

CRTO

Advertising Agencies
Criteo S.A.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$18.29
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

EDHL

Advertising Agencies
Everbright Digital Holding Limi
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$3.10
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CRTO Fair ValueCRTO Upside EDHL Fair ValueEDHL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $62.92 +244.0% $0.61 -80.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $28.87 +57.9% $0.38 -84.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CRTO vs EDHL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CRTO vs EDHL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CRTO scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs EDHL's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Criteo S.A. (CRTO) and Everbright Digital Holding Limi (EDHL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CRTO currently trades at $18.29 with a QOC of 8.9/10, while EDHL trades at $3.10 with a QOC of 2.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).