CRSR vs EVLV

Corsair Gaming, Inc. vs Evolv Technologies Holdings, In — Valuation Comparison 2026

CRSR

Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC
Corsair Gaming, Inc.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$12.14
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

EVLV

Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC
Evolv Technologies Holdings, In
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
36
LOW
Price
$6.45
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CRSR Fair ValueCRSR Upside EVLV Fair ValueEVLV Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.13 -57.8% $1.70 -73.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.89 -44.2% $0.73 -89.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CRSR vs EVLV — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CRSR vs EVLV — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EVLV scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs CRSR's 6.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Corsair Gaming, Inc. (CRSR) and Evolv Technologies Holdings, In (EVLV) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CRSR currently trades at $12.14 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while EVLV trades at $6.45 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).