CRSP vs CVM

CRISPR Therapeutics AG vs Cel-Sci Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

CRSP

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
CRISPR Therapeutics AG
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$56.18
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CVM

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Cel-Sci Corporation
Quality
3.3
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$1.54
Last close
Models
7/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CRSP Fair ValueCRSP Upside CVM Fair ValueCVM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $9.14 -83.7% $0.03 -98.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $27.66 -43.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.68 -98.8% $0.12 -94.8%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CRSP vs CVM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CRSP vs CVM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CRSP scores higher with a 6.2/10 quality rating vs CVM's 3.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) and Cel-Sci Corporation (CVM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CRSP currently trades at $56.18 with a QOC of 6.2/10, while CVM trades at $1.54 with a QOC of 3.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).