CROX vs DECK

Crocs, Inc. vs Deckers Outdoor Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

CROX

Footwear & Accessories
Crocs, Inc.
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$118.62
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

DECK

Footwear & Accessories
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$114.31
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CROX Fair ValueCROX Upside DECK Fair ValueDECK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $234.50 +97.7% $136.17 +19.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $184.43 +55.5% $79.06 -30.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CROX vs DECK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CROX vs DECK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DECK scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs CROX's 7.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CROX currently trades at $118.62 with a QOC of 7.8/10, while DECK trades at $114.31 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).