CRI vs JRSH

Carter's, Inc. vs Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CRI

Apparel & Other Finishd Prods of Fabrics & Similar Matl
Carter's, Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$38.59
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

JRSH

Apparel & Other Finishd Prods of Fabrics & Similar Matl
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$3.40
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CRI Fair ValueCRI Upside JRSH Fair ValueJRSH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $11.17 -71.1% $4.25 +25.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $14.19 -63.2% $0.87 -74.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CRI vs JRSH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CRI vs JRSH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CRI scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs JRSH's 7.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Carter's, Inc. (CRI) and Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CRI currently trades at $38.59 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while JRSH trades at $3.40 with a QOC of 7.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).