CRGO vs EXPD

Freightos Limited vs Expeditors International of Was — Valuation Comparison 2026

CRGO

Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo
Freightos Limited
Quality
5.6
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$2.01
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

EXPD

Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo
Expeditors International of Was
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$157.99
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CRGO Fair ValueCRGO Upside EXPD Fair ValueEXPD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.75 -62.4% $133.94 -15.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.71 -12.3% $60.06 -62.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CRGO vs EXPD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CRGO vs EXPD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EXPD scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs CRGO's 5.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Freightos Limited (CRGO) and Expeditors International of Was (EXPD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CRGO currently trades at $2.01 with a QOC of 5.6/10, while EXPD trades at $157.99 with a QOC of 9.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).