CRESY vs HHS

Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. vs Harte Hanks, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CRESY

Conglomerates
Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.86
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

HHS

Conglomerates
Harte Hanks, Inc.
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$2.58
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CRESY Fair ValueCRESY Upside HHS Fair ValueHHS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.14 -73.5% $10.97 +325.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.57 +77.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $69.03 +482.0%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CRESY vs HHS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CRESY vs HHS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HHS scores higher with a 6.0/10 quality rating vs CRESY's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. (CRESY) and Harte Hanks, Inc. (HHS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CRESY currently trades at $11.86 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while HHS trades at $2.58 with a QOC of 6.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).