CRDL vs EBS

Cardiol Therapeutics Inc. vs Emergent BioSolutions Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CRDL

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Cardiol Therapeutics Inc.
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.28
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

EBS

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Emergent BioSolutions Inc.
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$9.18
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CRDL Fair ValueCRDL Upside EBS Fair ValueEBS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.42 -67.4% $25.49 +177.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $52.15 +468.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.17 -86.7% $2.59 -71.8%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CRDL vs EBS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CRDL vs EBS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EBS scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs CRDL's 6.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cardiol Therapeutics Inc. (CRDL) and Emergent BioSolutions Inc. (EBS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CRDL currently trades at $1.28 with a QOC of 6.4/10, while EBS trades at $9.18 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).