CRCL vs EVR

Circle Internet Group, Inc. vs Evercore Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CRCL

Capital Markets
Circle Internet Group, Inc.
Quality
5.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$108.24
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

EVR

Capital Markets
Evercore Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$346.92
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CRCL Fair ValueCRCL Upside EVR Fair ValueEVR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $31.88 -70.6% $532.66 +53.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $49.36 -50.5% $147.70 -57.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CRCL vs EVR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CRCL vs EVR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EVR scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs CRCL's 5.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) and Evercore Inc. (EVR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CRCL currently trades at $108.24 with a QOC of 5.6/10, while EVR trades at $346.92 with a QOC of 9.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).