CRAI vs FCN

CRA International,Inc. vs FTI Consulting, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CRAI

Consulting Services
CRA International,Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$148.35
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

FCN

Consulting Services
FTI Consulting, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$154.90
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CRAI Fair ValueCRAI Upside FCN Fair ValueFCN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $41.57 -72.0% $18.95 -87.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $29.11 -80.4% $48.61 -68.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CRAI vs FCN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CRAI vs FCN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CRAI scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs FCN's 8.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing CRA International,Inc. (CRAI) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CRAI currently trades at $148.35 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while FCN trades at $154.90 with a QOC of 8.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).