CPHI vs CPRX

China Pharma Holdings, Inc. vs Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CPHI

Pharmaceutical Preparations
China Pharma Holdings, Inc.
Quality
3.9
out of 10
Value Trap
47
WARN
Price
$0.79
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

CPRX

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$31.23
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CPHI Fair ValueCPHI Upside CPRX Fair ValueCPRX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.27 -59.4% $31.62 +1.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $18.57 -40.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.06 -91.7% $41.43 +32.7%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CPHI vs CPRX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CPHI vs CPRX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CPRX scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs CPHI's 3.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (CPHI) and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CPRX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CPHI currently trades at $0.79 with a QOC of 3.9/10, while CPRX trades at $31.23 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).