COMP vs DOUG

Compass, Inc. vs Douglas Elliman Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

COMP

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
Compass, Inc.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$8.23
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

DOUG

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
Douglas Elliman Inc.
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
21
SAFE
Price
$1.80
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType COMP Fair ValueCOMP Upside DOUG Fair ValueDOUG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.22 -97.3% $0.23 -87.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.10 -22.2% $3.35 +70.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for COMP vs DOUG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

COMP vs DOUG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DOUG scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs COMP's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Compass, Inc. (COMP) and Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

COMP currently trades at $8.23 with a QOC of 5.9/10, while DOUG trades at $1.80 with a QOC of 6.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).