COIN vs ICE

Coinbase Global, Inc. vs Intercontinental Exchange Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

COIN

Financial Data & Stock Exchanges
Coinbase Global, Inc.
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$182.25
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

ICE

Financial Data & Stock Exchanges
Intercontinental Exchange Inc.
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$148.30
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType COIN Fair ValueCOIN Upside ICE Fair ValueICE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $149.14 -18.2% $117.59 -20.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $40.38 -77.8% $43.21 -70.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for COIN vs ICE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

COIN vs ICE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ICE scores higher with a 9.1/10 quality rating vs COIN's 9.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) and Intercontinental Exchange Inc. (ICE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

COIN currently trades at $182.25 with a QOC of 9.1/10, while ICE trades at $148.30 with a QOC of 9.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).