COGT vs CPHI

Cogent Biosciences, Inc. vs China Pharma Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

COGT

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Cogent Biosciences, Inc.
Quality
4.5
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$34.96
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

CPHI

Pharmaceutical Preparations
China Pharma Holdings, Inc.
Quality
3.9
out of 10
Value Trap
47
WARN
Price
$0.79
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType COGT Fair ValueCOGT Upside CPHI Fair ValueCPHI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $9.82 -71.9% $0.27 -59.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $16.18 -56.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.15 -99.6% $0.06 -91.7%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for COGT vs CPHI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

COGT vs CPHI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

COGT scores higher with a 4.5/10 quality rating vs CPHI's 3.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) and China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (CPHI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

COGT currently trades at $34.96 with a QOC of 4.5/10, while CPHI trades at $0.79 with a QOC of 3.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).